Recent Posts

• In-house Counsels concerned about Social Media Challenges
• Personal Jurisdiction established by way of Email transmission
• A $6 Million Discovery bill is NOT an outlier
• Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Amendments
• Fourth Circuit allows Punitive Damages without Proof of actual damages for plaintiff after employer Hacked into former employee’s AOL account
• An expensive eDiscovery lesson taught by the D.C. Circuit
• 2008: Five Groundbreaking cases In Ediscovery
• Defendant pays for not being thorough, efficient, and timely in E-Discovery
• Eight ways to Prepare for E-discovery in a pinch
• Is FRE 502 all it’s cracked up to be? Not so much
• Ediscovery Boot Camp
• SEC steps up its enforcement actions as it defines its priorities
• Litigation Holds
• The Glory Days are Over….we are now entering the Renaissance of litigation practice
• Ediscovery: Two different Judges, different reasoning, same conclusion, ease the discovery process
• 30(b)(6) witness sanctioned for lack of Knowlege about ESI systems
• New Federal Rule Of Evidence 502
• ABA Opines on Outsourcing
• The Sedona Conference working paper on E-Discovery of Inaccessible Information
• Judge Paul Grimm Gives Guidance on How to Conduct keyword searches

Categories

• E-discovery
• FCRP 26(c)
• Federal Rule of Evidence 502
• IT
• legal news
• Litigation holds
• Outsourcing
• Rule 30(b)(6)
• Spoilation
• Stored Communications Act

Archives

• June 2010
• June 2009
• May 2009
• April 2009
• March 2009
• February 2009
• December 2008
• November 2008
• October 2008
• September 2008
• August 2008
• July 2008
• June 2008
• May 2008
• April 2008
• March 2008
• January 2008

What's Up With E-Discovery Feeds and Sign up

• Login
• CONTACT: info@sentrycg.com
• XHTML
• Entries RSS
• Comments RSS

Links

• SENTRY CONSULTING GROUP - Home

E-discovery

January 21st, 2008   Filed Under E-discovery  

Comments